There's no particularly easy way to predict what they will decide—there's no reason
Posted: Sun Dec 22, 2024 6:19 am
The Case Against Originality SEO is going corporate. Big companies are doing it in-house instead of hiring a consultant; consultants are scaling up, hiring people, and growing into companies in their own right. Meanwhile, the search engines have more or less made their peace with SEOs: there's a lot that's prohibited, and everything else might as well be mandatory. Don't buy links. Do use descriptive title tags. Don't hide links. Do structure your site so good content is always a few clicks away.
Etc. If you come up with a novel strategy, it's pro email lists australia bably going to find its way into the dos. Or the don'ts. And using a new strategy means betting your results and your reputation on the outcome. ten consecutive "Please link to my site" emails should be morally superior to "link to my site and disclose it to your visitors, and I'll give you a dollar.
" And yet if you do the latter, and get caught, you're in trouble. Your strategy might not end up in the dos or the don'ts. It might end up in the "what?!"s, instead. Search engines may not care to endorse or ban your strategy because it doesn't have any visible effect. It's tempting to point to other technology innovator as proof that innovation can be rewarding. But bast amounts of wealth in technology are made with technology products, not services (Ross Perot, one of the few technology service providers to get really rich, also happened to treat employees like gears in a factory—basically a roundabout way of turning a service into a mass-produced product.
Etc. If you come up with a novel strategy, it's pro email lists australia bably going to find its way into the dos. Or the don'ts. And using a new strategy means betting your results and your reputation on the outcome. ten consecutive "Please link to my site" emails should be morally superior to "link to my site and disclose it to your visitors, and I'll give you a dollar.
" And yet if you do the latter, and get caught, you're in trouble. Your strategy might not end up in the dos or the don'ts. It might end up in the "what?!"s, instead. Search engines may not care to endorse or ban your strategy because it doesn't have any visible effect. It's tempting to point to other technology innovator as proof that innovation can be rewarding. But bast amounts of wealth in technology are made with technology products, not services (Ross Perot, one of the few technology service providers to get really rich, also happened to treat employees like gears in a factory—basically a roundabout way of turning a service into a mass-produced product.