We have quickly reviewed the phases of a continuous innovation process and tried to contextualize its basic principles by telling the success story of innovations in some sectors. Now we are ready to collect the suggestions that we have scattered throughout this article in three lessons, useful for those companies that intend to adopt a continuous innovation approach.
The implementation of continuous innovation often occurs in a confused israel whatsapp resource way and is ultimately ineffective. The problem has little to do with insufficient technological investment and instead concerns mainly business planning, which in many cases is still stuck on anachronistic business models.
Many companies still set up their overall strategies according to a “Waterfall” method even if they then disguise it as “Agile”.
With the Waterfall method (also known as Liner Sequential Life Cycle Model) the project is managed in a traditional and sequential way: a cascading succession of distinct phases, defined from the beginning, each of which generally ends before the next begins and the product is delivered to the customer at the end of the process.
In the Agile method, time is divided into phases of defined duration. Within each phase, it is established which product to deliver and by what date. If it is not possible to complete all the planned work, the work is redistributed and the information is used to plan the next phase. The work of each individual phase, once completed, is tested and evaluated by both the project team and the customer. The progress of the entire process is iterative.