There is no need to challenge electronic auctions

[roseline371274]

CONCLUSION: If the plaintiff was not a party to the purchase and sale agreement concluded at an electronic auction and, for example, believes that the winner of the auction is unscrupulous and did not acquire ownership of the purchased premises, he may use the method of protecting his rights expressly defined by law for such disputed legal relations.

To apply the requirement to recover property from someone else's possession, (the corresponding purchase and sale transaction), the protocol and act on the conducted electronic auctions drawn up on their basis, or the purchase and sale agreement set out in a separate document (see similar conclusions in the resolutions of the Grand Chamber of the Supreme Court of special database October 1, 2019 in case No. 910/3907/18 (paragraphs 52, 57) and October 5, 2021 in case No. 910/18647/19 (paragraph 9.32)).
A combat zone is not an argument for denying payments for the death of a law enforcement officer

For two years now, there have been problems with the payment of one-time cash assistance in the event of the death of not only military personnel, but also employees of law enforcement agencies.

In December 2023, the Verkhovna Rada made additional amendments to the legislation and expanded the list of persons entitled to receive a one-time cash benefit. This list was added to the children of the deceased (deceased), who, in particular, were adopted, conceived during the deceased's lifetime, but not yet born.

General difficulties in obtaining a lump sum cash benefit in the event of death (hereinafter referred to as the lump sum) arise most often due to people's low awareness of the procedure for completing the documents. And some nuances in the resolutions of the Cabinet of Ministers of Ukraine allow courts to deny people payments.